Yale journal looks at impact of 3D printing on health and environment
Next season NFL players will sport custom sports gear from HP FitStation 3D scanning solution
Polyga meets prosumer demand with new line of HDI Compact 3D scanners
Kodak and Twindom launch 3D scanning booth at CES 2018
Vulcain 2.1 test fired, 3D printed rocket engine parts to lift off in 2020
$2.9M 3D printing contract recharges U.S. Air Force legacy planes
Interview: Rocket Lab reaches orbit for first time, announces new advance for 3D printing powered mission
3D printing news Sliced, Google, Siemens, Stratasys and SLM Solutions
3D printing news Sliced, World Economic Forum, Deloitte, Carbon, Sharebot
Renishaw revenue up 17% driven by strong growth in additive manufacturing
The state of 3D printing in schools, 3D Printing Industry BETT 2018 report
Manufacturing Technologies Association supports UK Year of Engineering
PrintLab encourages humanities 3D printing with new Classroom portal
Forecast says Asia Pacific to spend $3.6 billion on 3D printing in next 3 years
Interview: Raise3D CEO on how to run a 3D printing business
IDC forecasts worldwide spending on 3D printing to be nearly $12 billion in 2018
GlassesUSA launches free glasses frame designs for 3D printing with artist Janne Kyttanen
China researchers construct artificial ears using 3D printing and tissue engineering
$30 million NIHR research center to open with 3D printed art installation
The Leapfrog Bolt Pro 3D printer review
MakePrintable file fixing is a 3D printers best friend
SLM Solutions metal 3D printing brakes the most powerful car in Bugatti history
Local Motors receives billion dollar support for Olli 3D printed bus
DNV GL publishes first class guideline for maritime additive manufacturing
Yale journal looks at impact of 3D printing on health and environment
A special edition of the Journal of Industrial Ecology, a peer-reviewed scientific journal produced by theCenter for Industrial Ecology(CIE) at theYale School of Forestry & Environmental Studies(F&ES), has looked at the environmental, energy and health impacts of additive manufacturing.
Entitled Environmental Dimensions of Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing, the November 2017 issue looks at product life cycles, process energy consumption, sustainability benefits and health and safety considerations in additive manufacturing.
The paper, funded by GE, the Lounsbery Foundation, and the US Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, was edited by Reid Lifset, Martin Baumers (University of Nottingham), William Flanagan (AspireSustainability), Tim Gutowski (Massachusetts Institute of Technology), and Joost Duflou and Karel Kellens (KU Leuven).
Understanding the environmental implications of 3D printing
According to Yales Kevin Dennehy, although the technological capabilities of additive manufacturing processes have been and continue to be studied extensively, there is still a gap in the understanding of their environmental implications.
Speaking to theF&ES news site, Reid Lifset, the journals editor in chief said that the research in this issue shows that it is too early to label 3D printing as the path to sustainable manufacturing.
Lifset cited the need for greater knowledge of material footprints, energy consumption in production, process emissions, and especially the linkages and alignments between the various stages in the production process.
In his editorial, Lifset notes that 3D printing has been as a source of autonomous environmental improvement, and asserts that most research on 3D printing has focused on the benefits and impacts of production.
Consideration has not been given, however, to waste products such as supports and residual feedstock. There are also potential problems associated with greater volume of production and therefore greater waste. This, he suggests, justifies research into 3D printing and industrial ecology.
Within the journal, articles by Daz Lantada et al. and Baumers et al. highlight the environmental opportunities presented by additive manufacturing of structures with high geometric complexity, focussing bioprinting and EBM processes respectively.
Extensive analysis of resource consumption patterns in additive manufacturing supply chains is approached by Holmström and Gutowski, while Cerdas et al. highlight the difficulties regulating and measuring 3D printing in private spheres, such as in homes. Mami et al. use a case study from the aeronautical industry to suggest an eco-efficiency method which combines life-cycle costs and life cycle environmental assessment.
Articles in the journal also look at product life cycles. Bours et al. identify the need for new assessment tools for the selection of 3D printing material, while Faludi et al. show that electricity use during 3D printing has, in general, the greatest environmental consequences.
Finally, health and safety considerations in 3D printing are considered in articles by Graff et al, Mendes et al, and Azimi et al. The risks that these articles identify include ultrafine substances produced during material extrusion, fine airborne metallic particles from powder bed fusion, and condensates from chemical processes. The affected range from industrial machine operators to users of desktop 3D printers in office environments.
The research suggests overall that the environmental performance and sustainability of 3D printing is very sensitive to the actual pattern of its usage and configuration of the machinery and materials applied to it.
The recommendations made by the journal editors include more thorough Life Cycle Assessments (LCAs) of 3D printed products, a greater awareness of how specific operating parameters affect environmental assessments, potential regulatory action to limit the effects of hazardous emissions, and more innovative eco-design techniques to unlock the full benefits of 3D printing.
The paper also calls for extended tools to monitor the environmental and ecological impact of integration of designs, product personalization, novel materials combinations, and localized production.
If we are to realize the environmental potential of 3D printing, we need to know where the challenges and the leverage points lie, summarised F&ES Dean Indy Burke.
The Yale paper follows researchpublished earlier this yearby the University of Grenoble on the environmental impact of 3D printing, and apaper produced by Kings College London, which argued that 3D printing was being hindered by a lack of collaboration between molecular scientists and engineers.
Environmental Dimensions of Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing, is published by Wiley-Blackwell and available to read online for free.
Nominations for the second annual 3D Printing Industry Awards are now open.Make your selections now.
For more information on 3D printing andsubscribe to our free 3D Printing Industry newsletter, follow us onTwitter, and like us onFacebook.
Featured image shows the library of theYale School of Forestry & Environmental Studies. Photo via Yale.
Rushabh Haria is a writer at 3D Printing Industry. Hailing from South London, he has a degree in Classics. His interests include the application of 3D printing technology to art and its popularisation.
Leading U.S. researchers demonstrate layer-free volumetric 3D printing
UAE scientists 3D print first composite gyroids inspired by nature
Tissue 3D printing expedited with finer in-air microfluidics at Twente
Rutgers 4D printing makes shapeshifting, drug delivering, soft robots
SLAC perfect recipe for metal 3D printing under investigation by Lawrence Livermore and Dept. of Energy
Aurora Labs signs $100,000 3D printing research deal with CSIRO
3D prints get another layer of security from Nanoscribe two-photon lithography
HP announces 3D printing partnership w
ith CEA for industrial and materials RD
MITs 3D printed mood rings may have the impact to cut fashion waste
Metal 3D printer uses cold spray to make better motors
Fraunhofer 3D printing and nanotech gets $37.3M boost from Hamburg
Northwesterns 3D printer auto generates designs for future Wi-Fi